Each one learns also that no victories are ever won by passively isolating oneself from life or by being self-centered. Having their archetypes in the comic book and Western heroes, Kesey’s McMurphy in One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Hank Stamper in Sometimes a Great Notion are vibrant personalities who defy the overwhelming forces of life by constantly asserting their dignity, significance, and freedom as human beings. Sammler’s Planet (1970), and even John Irving’s The Hotel New Hampshire (1981). Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye (1951), Joseph Heller’s Catch-22(1961), Saul Bellow’s Mr. Kesey’s solution is similar to the solutions found in J. Kesey came to believe that people must not and cannot isolate themselves from life they must meet life on its own terms and discover their own saving grace. Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate.” The system, preachments, and methodologies of the twentieth century had indeed betrayed humankind and left only two choices: People could either passively conform and thus lose their individuality or find some way to exist in the modern wasteland without losing their dignity and freedom. One of the counterculture’s protest slogans underscored this plight: “I am a human being. For Kesey, mass society represents big business, government, labor, communication, and religion and thus subordinates the individual, who is stripped of dignity, significance, and freedom.
Although Kesey was pro-America and admired American democracy per se, he abhorred those things in society that seemed to deprive people of individuality and freedom. Second, Kesey detested the mass society image that seemed to dominate life in twentieth century America. Instead, he must immerse himself in the waves so that he can “ride the waves of existence” and become one with the waves. In “Over the Border,” for example, Deboree realizes, as he bobs up and down in the ocean’s waves, that man does not become a superman by isolating himself from reality and life. First, he learned that drugs were not the answer to changing society and that one cannot passively drop out of life.
In that it emphasized some major problems in the United States, the counterculture had its merits, but it was, at best, a child’s romantic dreamworld, inevitably doomed, because it did not consider answers to the ultimate question: “After the drugs, what is next?”įrom Kesey’s counterculture experiences, however, he learned at least two important lessons. Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land (1961) that means to achieve a calm ecstasy, to contemplate the present moment. One of the main avenues to this new type of life and freedom was mind-expanding drugs, which allowed them to grok, a word from Robert A. At the core of the protest was the value of individual freedom. They protested by experimenting with Eastern meditation, primitive communal living, unabashed nudity, and nonpossessive physical and spiritual love. Originating with the 1950’s Beat generation, the 1960’s counterculture youth were disillusioned with the vast social injustices, the industrialization, and the mass society image in their parents’ world they questioned many values and practices-the Vietnam War, the goals of higher education, the value of owning property, and the traditional forms of work.
To understand some of the ideas behind the counterculture revolution is to understand Ken Kesey’s (1935 – 2001) fictional heroes and some of his themes. Think of Truffaut's The Bride Wore Black as the lumpiest fruit borne out of that union.By NASRULLAH MAMBROL on Decem Curiously, the upstart who related most ardently to the older auteur was also the one with the least in common stylistically and spiritually: François Truffaut, whose freewheeling camera and affection for hypersensitive characters put him at the opposite side of the spectrum from the implacable visual exactitude and jaundiced worldview which characterized the Master of Suspense…. "Whether direct or circuitous, traces of Hitch can be felt in Godard's insistence on filmic technique visibly and violently manifesting itself, Chabrol's fascination with human duality and repressed beastliness, Rohmer's Catholic examinations of private moralities, and even Rivette's view of a world precariously suspended over various trap doors. "he shadow of Alfred Hitchcock would loom heavily over the works of the young critics who took up cameras and formed the French New Wave," writes Fernando F Croce in Slant.
0 kommentar(er)
